PUBLICATIONS
The AGDI has published substantially in fulfillment of its mission statement of contributing to knowledge towards African development:
IDEAS
http://ideas.repec.org/d/agdiycm.html
ECONSTOR
https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/escollectionhome/10419/123513
Publication List
2017 |
|
1. | Tchamyou, Ndemaze Asongu Nina Tchamyou Simplice Asongu Vanessa Empirical Economics, 2017. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Terrorism; Common policies; governance; Africa @article{Asongu_393, author = {Ndemaze Asongu Nina Tchamyou Simplice Asongu Vanessa Tchamyou}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00181-017-1378-3}, doi = {10.1007/s00181-017-1378-3}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-12-26}, journal = {Empirical Economics}, abstract = {This study assesses government mechanisms in the fight against terrorism with particular emphasis on the bundling and unbundling of ten governance dynamics. The empirical evidence is based on a panel of 53 African countries for period 1998–2012 and generalized method of moments. The following findings are established. First, for the most part, political governance and its constituents, respectively, have negative effects on all terrorism dynamics, with the following consistent increasing order of negative magnitude: unclear terrorism, transnational terrorism, domestic terrorism and total terrorism. Second, overwhelmingly for economic and institutional governances, the governance dynamics and their constituent components affect terrorism negatively, with the magnitude on domestic terrorism consistently higher than that on transnational terrorism. Third, for most specifications, the effect of general governance is consistently negative on terrorism variables. Theoretical and practical policy implications are discussed.}, keywords = {Terrorism; Common policies; governance; Africa}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This study assesses government mechanisms in the fight against terrorism with particular emphasis on the bundling and unbundling of ten governance dynamics. The empirical evidence is based on a panel of 53 African countries for period 1998–2012 and generalized method of moments. The following findings are established. First, for the most part, political governance and its constituents, respectively, have negative effects on all terrorism dynamics, with the following consistent increasing order of negative magnitude: unclear terrorism, transnational terrorism, domestic terrorism and total terrorism. Second, overwhelmingly for economic and institutional governances, the governance dynamics and their constituent components affect terrorism negatively, with the magnitude on domestic terrorism consistently higher than that on transnational terrorism. Third, for most specifications, the effect of general governance is consistently negative on terrorism variables. Theoretical and practical policy implications are discussed. |
2. | Tchamyou, Ndemaze Asongu Nina Tchamyou Simplice Asongu Vanessa 2017. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Terrorism; Common policies; governance; Africa @unpublished{Asongu_405, author = {Ndemaze Asongu Nina Tchamyou Simplice Asongu Vanessa Tchamyou}, url = {http://www.afridev.org/RePEc/agd/agd-wpaper/Fighting-terrorism-in-Africa-evidence-from-bundling-and-unbundling-institutions.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-11-13}, abstract = {This study assesses government mechanisms in the fight against terrorism with particular emphasis on the bundling and unbundling of ten governance dynamics. The empirical evidence is based on a panel of 53 African countries for period 1998-2012 and Generalized Method of Moments. The following findings are established. First, for the most part, political governance and its constituents respectively have negative effects on all terrorism dynamics, with the following consistent increasing order of negative magnitude: unclear terrorism, transnational terrorism, domestic terrorism and total terrorism. Second, overwhelmingly for economic and institutional governances, the governance dynamics and their constituent components affect terrorism negatively, with the magnitude on domestic terrorism consistently higher than that on transnational terrorism. Third, for most specifications, the effect of general governance is consistently negative on terrorism variables. Theoretical and practical policy implications are discussed.}, keywords = {Terrorism; Common policies; governance; Africa}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {unpublished} } This study assesses government mechanisms in the fight against terrorism with particular emphasis on the bundling and unbundling of ten governance dynamics. The empirical evidence is based on a panel of 53 African countries for period 1998-2012 and Generalized Method of Moments. The following findings are established. First, for the most part, political governance and its constituents respectively have negative effects on all terrorism dynamics, with the following consistent increasing order of negative magnitude: unclear terrorism, transnational terrorism, domestic terrorism and total terrorism. Second, overwhelmingly for economic and institutional governances, the governance dynamics and their constituent components affect terrorism negatively, with the magnitude on domestic terrorism consistently higher than that on transnational terrorism. Third, for most specifications, the effect of general governance is consistently negative on terrorism variables. Theoretical and practical policy implications are discussed. |