PUBLICATIONS
The AGDI has published substantially in fulfillment of its mission statement of contributing to knowledge towards African development:
IDEAS
http://ideas.repec.org/d/agdiycm.html
ECONSTOR
https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/escollectionhome/10419/123513
Publication List
2016 |
|
1. | A, Nwachukwu Asongu J C S Politics & Policy, 44 (5), pp. 916-944, 2016. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Law; Politics; Democracy; Government Policy; Development @article{Asongu_521, author = {Nwachukwu J C Asongu S. A}, url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12171/full}, doi = {10.1111/polp.12171/full}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-10-14}, journal = {Politics & Policy}, volume = {44}, number = {5}, pages = {916-944}, abstract = {This article examines interconnections between law, politics, and the quality of government in Africa. We investigate whether African democracies enjoy relatively better government quality (GQ) compared to their counterparts with more autocratic inclinations. The empirical evidence is based on instrumental variable two-stage least squares and fixed effects with data from 38 African countries for the period 1994-2010. Political regimes of democracy, polity, and autocracy are instrumented with income levels, legal origins, religious dominations, and press freedom to account for the GQ dynamics of corruption control, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, political stability, regulation quality, and the rule of law. Findings show that democracy has an edge over autocracy while the latter and polity overlap. As a policy implication, democracy once initiated should be accelerated to edge the appeals of authoritarian regimes.}, keywords = {Law; Politics; Democracy; Government Policy; Development}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article examines interconnections between law, politics, and the quality of government in Africa. We investigate whether African democracies enjoy relatively better government quality (GQ) compared to their counterparts with more autocratic inclinations. The empirical evidence is based on instrumental variable two-stage least squares and fixed effects with data from 38 African countries for the period 1994-2010. Political regimes of democracy, polity, and autocracy are instrumented with income levels, legal origins, religious dominations, and press freedom to account for the GQ dynamics of corruption control, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, political stability, regulation quality, and the rule of law. Findings show that democracy has an edge over autocracy while the latter and polity overlap. As a policy implication, democracy once initiated should be accelerated to edge the appeals of authoritarian regimes. |
2. | Asongu, Jacinta Nwachukwu Simplice C A Law, Politics and the Quality of Government in Africa 2016. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Law; Politics; Democracy; Government Policy; Development @workingpaper{Asongu2016cd, title = {Law, Politics and the Quality of Government in Africa}, author = {Jacinta Nwachukwu C Simplice A. Asongu}, editor = {African 2016 Governance and Development Institute WP/16/019}, url = {http://www.afridev.org/RePEc/agd/agd-wpaper/Law-politics-and-the-quality-of-government-in-Africa.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, abstract = {This paper examines interconnections between law, politics and the quality of government in Africa. We investigate whether African democracies enjoy relatively better government quality compared to their counterparts with more autocratic inclinations. The empirical evidence is based on Instrumental variable Two-Stage-Least Squares and Fixed Effects with data from 38 African countries for the period 1994-2010. Political regimes of democracy, polity and autocracy are instrumented with income-levels, legal-origins, religious-dominations and press-freedom to account for government quality dynamics, of corruption-control, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, political-stability, regulation quality and the rule of law. Findings show that democracy has an edge over autocracy while the latter and polity overlap. As a policy implication, democracy once initiated should be accelerated to edge the appeals of authoritarian regimes.}, keywords = {Law; Politics; Democracy; Government Policy; Development}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {workingpaper} } This paper examines interconnections between law, politics and the quality of government in Africa. We investigate whether African democracies enjoy relatively better government quality compared to their counterparts with more autocratic inclinations. The empirical evidence is based on Instrumental variable Two-Stage-Least Squares and Fixed Effects with data from 38 African countries for the period 1994-2010. Political regimes of democracy, polity and autocracy are instrumented with income-levels, legal-origins, religious-dominations and press-freedom to account for government quality dynamics, of corruption-control, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, political-stability, regulation quality and the rule of law. Findings show that democracy has an edge over autocracy while the latter and polity overlap. As a policy implication, democracy once initiated should be accelerated to edge the appeals of authoritarian regimes. |
2011 |
|
3. | Asongu, Simplice A Law, Democracy and the Quality of Government in Africa 2011. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Law; Politics; Democracy; Government Policy; Development @workingpaper{Asongu2011bc, title = {Law, Democracy and the Quality of Government in Africa}, author = {Simplice A Asongu}, editor = {African 2011 Governance and Development Institute WP/11/018}, url = {http://www.afridev.org/RePEc/agd/agd-wpaper/Law-democracy-and-the-quality-of-government-in-Africa.pdf}, year = {2011}, date = {2011-12-01}, abstract = {This paper examines the big questions of African comparative politics. It assesses the interaction of three crucial components in the development of the continent: law, democracy and quality of government. Political regimes of democracy, polity and autocracy are instrumented with income-levels, legal-origins, religious-dominations and press-freedom levels to account for government quality dynamics of corruption-control, government-effectiveness, voice and accountability, political-stability, regulation quality and rule of law. Findings indicate democracy has an edge over autocracy while the later and polity overlap. A democracy that takes into account only the voice of the majority is better in government quality than autocracy, while a democracy that takes into account the voice of the minority (polity) is worse in government quality than autocracy. As a policy implication, democracy once initiated should be accelerated to edge the appeals of authoritarian regimes and reap the benefits of time and level hypotheses.}, keywords = {Law; Politics; Democracy; Government Policy; Development}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {workingpaper} } This paper examines the big questions of African comparative politics. It assesses the interaction of three crucial components in the development of the continent: law, democracy and quality of government. Political regimes of democracy, polity and autocracy are instrumented with income-levels, legal-origins, religious-dominations and press-freedom levels to account for government quality dynamics of corruption-control, government-effectiveness, voice and accountability, political-stability, regulation quality and rule of law. Findings indicate democracy has an edge over autocracy while the later and polity overlap. A democracy that takes into account only the voice of the majority is better in government quality than autocracy, while a democracy that takes into account the voice of the minority (polity) is worse in government quality than autocracy. As a policy implication, democracy once initiated should be accelerated to edge the appeals of authoritarian regimes and reap the benefits of time and level hypotheses. |